[ Back
| Apsa_itp List Archives Top-Level
| Apsa_itp List Info ]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ Back | Apsa_itp List Archives Top-Level | Apsa_itp List Info ]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy - Very quiet!
- To: apsa_itp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy - Very quiet!
- From: "Peter Muhlberger" <peter.muhlberger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:01:12 -0500
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mfSuqzmrNWc32i9dBqLW+xt7Q0QUVhMJ2bvPMxki/cWJhPuOhd5rFCwRV7cAYfGbzd5MlBiLnJoRQd18BJlyi9BpAj1e6+ax/C47aL+WyxbTjlq3NisKWxfoWFKKxSCPmc7LrYM+hfaR9EyW+iI663+c1ivpwmrMLfaRjCSOkis?=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RWX41/zVscE7O8i/pdgjOLOzRtqiXGyVPttGJMu1W+FkAehwN/0xYDMCmPO4GCLboQgYuRaPyr6VgM/dvmtLhaUyaO4F6K2VbIly5isPAP2mb/X/1Q9P13I5HJQuJopsPEZ4julrrTYhnKzhM7DUhOlNfpnu3oY3pyXdmgor7bY?=
- In-reply-to: <be3f1aec0708181055r6c91f185r53a49dc5614ab745@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@mail.hmdc.harvard.edu?body=unsubscribe%20apsa_itp_at_lists_hmdc_harvard_edu>
- References: <20070816053854.GA7399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200708171037.l7HAbt8c010726@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070818121153.GA13561@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <be3f1aec0708181055r6c91f185r53a49dc5614ab745@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-apsa_itp_at_lists_hmdc_harvard_edu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi folks: The following exchange actually goes rather well to support a point I made earlier against the rational ignorance hypothesis, saying that the real issue is identity not economic rationality. Michael has deeply internalized his membership in the open source quadrant of the Internet, so much so that he appears to spend much of his life and time contributing freely to this community (albeit in fairness, I'm guessing he draws a salary from somewhere...). His connection to the community is valuable and critical to him, and overrides economic rationality (he could probably make a lot more money working for Microsoft...). It's very easy for him to imagine that others are like him and could bring such a community identity to the political sphere, making politics 'open source'. He even predicts an 'open source' world govt. in 6-10 years (now there's a bet I'd like to take ;-) .... ). Steffen, my more cynical social science colleague, sees things from an economic rationality point of view and simply can't imagine a world in which more than a tiny fraction of the public (and an irrational one at that!) would participate in direct democracy. My own view is intermediate between these. I think Steffen accurately describes how most people are today--trying hard to make ends meet and maximizing their economic payoffs. On the other hand, how people are today is not how they necessarily must be, though change would not be easy. The contrast between Steffen and Michael leads to some interesting questions: With many people desperately trying to make ends meet in their Walmart jobs, how can we expect them to contribute meaningfully to politics? There may need to be economic structural changes to make idealistic self governance fly.... Michael no doubt draws intrinsic pleasure from solving complex problems and contributing meaningfully to the computing community. But, how many people can make real contributions to the political community that would sustain their engagement? Cheers, Peter -- apsa_itp mailing list served by Harvard-MIT Data Center List Address: apsa_itp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.hmdc.harvard.edu/?info=apsa_itp
- References:
- [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy
- From: Michael Allan
- [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy - Very quiet!
- From: Steffen W Schmidt
- Re: [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy - Very quiet!
- From: Michael Allan
- [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy
- Prev by Date: Re: [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy - Very quiet!
- Next by Date: [apsa_itp] Can committees create great ... whatever's?
- Previous by thread: Re: [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy - Very quiet!
- Next by thread: Re: [apsa_itp] a quiet revolution in democracy - Very quiet!
- Index(es):
[ Back | Apsa_itp List Archives Top-Level | Apsa_itp List Info ]